fotolobo
Avatar

For your photos in HDR that use Aurora or Photomatix? Which is best for you?


digicam
Avatar

I'll Stick with Photomatix Pro.


carmelsoul
Avatar

I know Aurora offers a 30 day free trial. I'd recommend that you download and try it for yourself. That way you can do a side by side and determine what application is best for you


fotolobo
Avatar

Photomatix definitely


fotolobo
Avatar

and I photomatix


fotolobo
Avatar

Well I tried it and I definitely stay with photomatix ... I still do not master it but with Photoshop and Photomatix I work well.


guyhawkins
Avatar

I have continually wrestled with Photomatix (and Pro) since I fell under the spell of HDR. I just cannot get the results that so many of the other members get using Photomatix. I find it very difficult to control the haloing and the "haziness", especially in foliage. The details of foliage often transform into smudges or smears, liken a Van Gogh or Cezanne painting...I see many members get beautiful results, but they elude me. I prefer very sharp detail (in most scenes, but certainly not all), vivid color, and generally I like brightness.

My work flow has evolved to this:

1) RAW image into LR5, expose as much detail as possible in the highlights and shadows (while trying to maintain reasonable contrast; VERY gentle S curve).
2) Boost sharpness, clarity, radiance, color saturation, but VERY modestly.
3) IN PS Elements, use NIK Collection Dfine2 to limit noise,
4) and use various modified filters and presets in NIK Collection Color Efex4 to apply HDR "flavor"....

Re: Aurora, I have used it a few times, and been happy with the result, but I just seem to get faster and better results with my processes described above.


pixel_komando
Avatar

The result you talk about seems to be another blending mode. I mean you make fisrt belnding in HDR, and so you make another one with one of the RAW files in Lightroom or others.
I often do it when tress are too weirds.