@billyspad: you can see the shot 0.
http://hdrcreme.com/users/4875-pandarino
13 Apr 12:11
__banned__user_
Leonardo I did not mean it had not been through HDR software I meant I thought the process was much too light. I tend to like to see the HDR effect. Sorry for the confusion my friend
13 Apr 13:21
pixel_komando
10. Because it's pure HDR. No oversatured colors, no cartoon effect, clean and sharp. That's HDR! Well done
13 Apr 13:21
pixel_komando
10. Because it's pure HDR. No oversatured colors, no cartoon effect, clean and sharp. That's HDR! Well done
13 Apr 14:09
digicam
I agree with Vince....Super Clean
13 Apr 14:44
bjosted
10
13 Apr 19:00
sanz3jo
9
13 Apr 20:46
flipd1
9
13 Apr 22:01
deleted_user_
Maybe not astonishing but I like it ! Better than the french 50cm3 :-) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/Peugeot_103_SP_1985.JPG
13 Apr 23:10
josephc
9
14 Apr 04:36
dmitry
Like the process, but dislike the POV.
14 Apr 15:59
cocomoni
great process LEo..the background distracts a little..
9
Cannot see much trace of HDR here. An honest 8
@billyspad: you can see the shot 0. http://hdrcreme.com/users/4875-pandarino
Leonardo I did not mean it had not been through HDR software I meant I thought the process was much too light. I tend to like to see the HDR effect. Sorry for the confusion my friend
10. Because it's pure HDR. No oversatured colors, no cartoon effect, clean and sharp. That's HDR! Well done
10. Because it's pure HDR. No oversatured colors, no cartoon effect, clean and sharp. That's HDR! Well done
I agree with Vince....Super Clean
10
9
9
Maybe not astonishing but I like it ! Better than the french 50cm3 :-) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/Peugeot_103_SP_1985.JPG
9
Like the process, but dislike the POV.
great process LEo..the background distracts a little..