'40 Ford Custom Interior

Picture by digicam


  • 8391
  • 40
  • 0
  • April 14, 2012
  • Picture of the day
  • Nikon D300
  • Nikkor 18-200mmVR
  • Shooting Style Tripod
  • Shoots Number Multiple Exposure
  • Exposures Number -3,0,+3
  • Editing Software Photomatix Pro
  • File Format RAW
  • Notes Topaz In Focus & DeNoise
HDR cars autos vintage classics digicam e neighbor nikon nikon D300 leather Ford custom

57 Comments

14 Apr 01:17
digicam

Will Post Image of Car and Engine on Future Dates. You can see me and my Tripod in the Fender and Again as the Fender reflects onto the side of the car. Thanks In Advance to All Who View, Comment, and Vote. Much Apprecaited!

14 Apr 01:25
ibraheem

amazing

14 Apr 01:29
fredzhang

Perfect processing!

14 Apr 01:45
philk80

Yes, perfect !

14 Apr 06:43
simon_bull

Brillant processing - you can smell the leather!

14 Apr 06:59
pecoreproduction

OMG....!!!

14 Apr 10:01
bjosted

Amazing view. "20+

14 Apr 10:12
arthakker

stunning

14 Apr 11:01
rrr

Excellent image, and also excellent process.

14 Apr 11:38
mau67

processo super,perfetta!

14 Apr 12:36
ardas1968

breathtaking!

14 Apr 13:13
trairao

Favolosa !!!

14 Apr 13:41
sanz3jo

Wonderful!

14 Apr 14:21
arnie58

I like it!

14 Apr 14:46
pandarino

perfect process, but too used this subject (-1 for this)

14 Apr 14:56
mirkkis74

Nice details! And perfect proces!

14 Apr 15:18
ThomasHack

Flawless! I can smell the fine leather-seats... ;-)

14 Apr 15:30
digicam

@ Leonardo..... Your Comment "too used this subject (-1 for this) What a CONTRADITION! You posted the SAME SUBJECT.....A CAR! LMAO!

14 Apr 15:44
inkslinger

PERFECT PROCESSING Colour & details are amazing....

14 Apr 16:27
peter

pure classic! both the car and the photo!

14 Apr 17:22
monaris

Super shot.

14 Apr 18:55
kajzu

Beautiful! I think the car is very old.

14 Apr 19:12
risotto

Perfect.No error.For me photo of the day.

14 Apr 19:50
johnt

No need for comment...

14 Apr 21:55
pandarino

you did not understand what I wrote, I said that you use for the third time the same car .... However, I voted 9 .....ok

14 Apr 22:01
ruhri

Ed, next time load up a picture of yourself, too! :-)

14 Apr 22:10
ruhri

Pandarino, you seem to like just finding something negative in every other member´s picture. I don´t like this attitude at all - but I told you this a long time ago. Seems like you didn´t take notice of what I said. You´re a great photographer ... but I h

14 Apr 22:13
ruhri

. but I have a problerm with people like you ... or better: their attitude. Just like Simon Bull: great photographer, but hardly votes. Do you understand what my point as a friendly humang beeing is??

14 Apr 22:16
pandarino

then you do not know enough "pandarino" ........ but never mind ... a Greeting

14 Apr 23:50
digicam

@ Leonardo...Get your facts STRAIGHT BEFORE MAKE A STATEMENT:I posted a '38 Packard TWO DIFFERENT VIEWS, I POSTED (1) View of a '37 Oldsmobile and ONE VIEW yesterday of a '32 FORD Roadster in B&W with other Vehicles lined up along side the Motel. Check my

14 Apr 23:52
digicam

Continued: Check My Portfolio. THIS IS THE FIRST POSTING OF THIS CAR....NOT THE THIRD AS YOU CLAIM. READ FIRST LINE OF DESCRIPTION ABOVE, "Will Post Image of Car and Engine on Future Dates."

14 Apr 23:55
digicam

I am beginning to belive Rainer (ruhri) is quite right about you and your attitude. VERY DISAPPOINTING! ENOUGH SAID IN THIS MATTER. LET'S MOVE ON.

15 Apr 02:35
jim98550

Fantastic!!! Goes great with your other vehcile pics. I like the others as well.

15 Apr 04:41
pandarino

you say inaccurate things about me ...... I'm not what you write, look before you pass judgment, each day with 10 votes, 9 and 8 to 8 and a number of users you are among those that have won many 10 from me. Meanwhile you have another POD compliments

15 Apr 05:06
dirk

Great work. I have to try something like this, very inspirating.

15 Apr 06:26
oaanesta

It is interessting to see how intense discussions can be around meanings. We are individualists people and it is free to vote how you like. The most interessting to see is every comments (without 2) generates new votes, so if you like to give 9 point, and

15 Apr 06:27
oaanesta

enter 4 time, you give the photo 36 point, so why not give a 10 without lots of inrellevant comments for the photo. A view of a photo is not about how many times the objekt is used, but how the photo is. Cindy Crawford ia used many times, but still the ph

15 Apr 06:28
oaanesta

photos is good. digicam is not the number 1 rated photographer on this website without a reason and again he show us why.

15 Apr 06:30
oaanesta

He photo is just perfect. I would like to give 36 points aswell, but keep me to the normal ratings. By the way, Cindy Crawford is a mutch used, but still the photos is good looking :-)

15 Apr 09:47
vendenis

I don't know how I missed this. Perfect as always, congrats on weel deserved POTD.

15 Apr 12:38
digicam

@ ole johan...Thanks for your comment and POV in this Matter. The Fact that I received a (9) on my image by Leonardo (pandarino) does not bother me in the least. It's the Inaccurate Facts that he stated for giving me the (9). I think most here Understand

15 Apr 15:22
pandarino

@ digicam: sorry for my bad judgment

15 Apr 18:16
digicam

@ Leonardo: I accept your Apology. However to avoid any Future "Bad Judgements" by either of us I would Greatly Appreciate if You Would NOT COMMENT or VOTE on any more of my Post. I will DO SAME FOR YOU!

15 Apr 19:36
flipd1

Great job.

15 Apr 22:05
junglejennifer

Very clean! Looks great. Your in it too!

16 Apr 02:51
paul_harmon

Nice image. I hated to see two members that I both respect get into a disagreement. I don't take any comments personally about my work. If I think it's constructive I am ok with it.

16 Apr 07:48
bluehowz

I see you in the reflection...

16 Apr 19:16
mcasalino

too brown for my taste, and also your reflection is on the car

16 Apr 20:29
oysterphish311

did this get photo of the week because so many people were complaining and arguing, while posting 10s everytime? very sad. great processing, but boring.... not photo of the week-worthy....

16 Apr 21:08
digicam

@ oysterphish311. To answer your question. NO, it did not make Photo of the week because of Arguing. It made Photo of the week because of the Number of Votes and Rating it received. That's How It Works.

16 Apr 21:12
oysterphish311

but look at how many times the same person voted because they were carrying their sentences on to another line. i'm not tryin' to be a jerk or anything, but if people are going to rant and rave, they shouldn't keep including a rating everytime. nothing

16 Apr 21:13
oysterphish311

against this photo or anything. i'm just disenchanted that this turned into a bickering match amoungst the other users

16 Apr 21:15
digicam

Continued: I Agree that it should not have been POW. I think Dirk's image "Hidden Stairway" was better. But he did not receive enough Votes. If you would have Preffered that image to mine then you should have Voted on it as I did. Sorry you found it borin

16 Apr 21:20
digicam

Continued: Sorry you found it boring. It seems the other 34 Members LIKE Boring Photos. As for the voting, NO Matter how many times you comment the VOTE ONLY COUNTS ONE TIME! As for the Back and Forth You don't know what the discussion was about.

23 May 18:42
toady

But! I can see the reflection of you =)

25 May 10:59
mariannea

Yes, there is definitely reflection of you :))

04 Jul 03:18
roland

What a beaut-- the car and the photograph.. very nice work.

Add Comment