too many ev in this location requires more shots (-3, -4)
15 Feb 14:14
__banned__user_
That man pandarino sure knows his stuff huh. And he is right ya know. So go back my man and re-shoot. In the mean time have a scintillating and titillating 10.
15 Feb 14:47
rteo
8-9 I see a slight loss of detail in the highlights.
15 Feb 15:01
jphoto
Loss of detail due to blown out areas, agree, need more shots.
15 Feb 17:56
Randall.Lohr
Agree as stated, to bring in the details, you need a few more LOW ev's. It's surprisingly bright for a 100ISO stop the lens down to about 22 to cut the light level as well.
15 Feb 22:26
rrr
Bit too painterly for my liking, nice shot though.
16 Feb 01:33
jayp
Nice image...too much detail loss in the processing
too many ev in this location requires more shots (-3, -4)
That man pandarino sure knows his stuff huh. And he is right ya know. So go back my man and re-shoot. In the mean time have a scintillating and titillating 10.
8-9 I see a slight loss of detail in the highlights.
Loss of detail due to blown out areas, agree, need more shots.
Agree as stated, to bring in the details, you need a few more LOW ev's. It's surprisingly bright for a 100ISO stop the lens down to about 22 to cut the light level as well.
Bit too painterly for my liking, nice shot though.
Nice image...too much detail loss in the processing
Agree with comments.