I have to agree with Leonardo here. Not much sign of HDR anywhere. Maybe that's why it so clean huh
04 Apr 15:32
sanz3jo
9
04 Apr 15:33
bjosted
Agree wirh pandarino. A bit pale as well, and some dark areas
04 Apr 15:36
isa
Thank you for your kind comments, yes, so obviously I have read and practiced the HDR, and what I like is that the process seems so real as if it were a perfect shot, something difficult to achieve with a single exposure ... therefore hdr gives you the fr
04 Apr 15:50
flipd1
very light on the hdr if at all. Don't be afraid of the sliders my friend... just don't go over board..
04 Apr 16:07
gedmas
IMO: subject choice = 10 (quite a potential place for HDR); composition = 9, the process = 6 (the hdr efex and You are capable for more). Overall score = 8.33
04 Apr 16:11
isa
thank you all for your time and comments appreciated, I'll keep my account safe hdr next
04 Apr 17:54
yoctox
Missing hdr for me
04 Apr 22:15
rcuello
rc
04 Apr 22:20
romzhy
I like this shot, just lack of HDR effect, a tad more saturation with lightening dark parts.
I see very little post-processing
nice n clean
I have to agree with Leonardo here. Not much sign of HDR anywhere. Maybe that's why it so clean huh
9
Agree wirh pandarino. A bit pale as well, and some dark areas
Thank you for your kind comments, yes, so obviously I have read and practiced the HDR, and what I like is that the process seems so real as if it were a perfect shot, something difficult to achieve with a single exposure ... therefore hdr gives you the fr
very light on the hdr if at all. Don't be afraid of the sliders my friend... just don't go over board..
IMO: subject choice = 10 (quite a potential place for HDR); composition = 9, the process = 6 (the hdr efex and You are capable for more). Overall score = 8.33
thank you all for your time and comments appreciated, I'll keep my account safe hdr next
Missing hdr for me
rc
I like this shot, just lack of HDR effect, a tad more saturation with lightening dark parts.
All said, great effort.