this is not a photography, is digital manipulation and for a digital manipulation is not very good. i don't like it! so i prefer not to vote
but i must admit the idea is quite nice
Didn't get it. Sorry.
for all: This is the fusion of 4 shots each processed in HDR. In the past they were made of several photos manipolate..ma there was all this negative comment, indeed. (Eg you go to look at the pictures of darrellburnet in his portfolio, he has some great
...... photos), they were much appreciated. Of course everyone is free to vote, but I think that I am free to publish what I believe as long as the photos are made in HDR or a combination of several pictures in HDR
Please to see:
@gedmas: see your comment "10" for my manipulation
This is a great idea. I've seen other photos here that were also 'manipulated', so no problem there. My only real negative is the tree and patch of grass on the back of the cow. Masking issues?
I am not sure why everyone is so against "digital manipulation. As long as each component of the composite is real and each is HDR on its own then I am fine with it. We get so wound up as to what things "should" be that we don't see the art work for wha
it is.... Artwork. Every time we drag a set of photos in Phototmatix we are "manipulating' the image digitally. This is after all "digital" Photography... right? Anyway this is very creative and I like it.
I like this work, very creative, just the tree on the right side looks weird clone brush is noticeable. Brilliant idea.
Well as the aforementioned person in your comments, I have to say I TOTALLY get it 10, it's TOTALLY weird 10 and I TOTALLY love it! 10 MORE MORE MORE! :-) 10 (AND a HUGE WOW!!) 10
I was just going to type what I've only just noticed Phil typed, that if putting three photographs through an HDR processor, then importing into Photoshop via Lightroom and applying filters isn't manipulation, I don't know what is!
theme, composition-10; light, atmosphere-10; impressive, mood-8; artistic-10; technical-9 [9.40]
keep doing it, be yourself